LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Ochodo, Eleanor A, Naidoo, Selvan, Schumacher, Samuel, Steingart, Karen, Deeks, Jon, Cobelens, Frank, Bossuyt, Patrick M, Young, Taryn and Nicol, Mark P (2019) 'Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders'. Wellcome Open Research, Vol 4, Issue 183, pp. 1-13.

[img]
Preview
Text
3df22f25-c23c-46fe-bdbd-b1ff93ebd25f_15551_-_eleanor_ochodo.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (629kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Studies evaluating the impact of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis (TB) have demonstrated varied effects on health outcomes with many studies showing inconclusive results. We explored perceptions among diverse stakeholders about studies evaluating the impact of TB diagnostic tests, and identified suggestions for improving these studies.
Methods: We used purposive sampling with consideration for differing expertise and geographical balance and conducted in depth semi-structured interviews. We interviewed English-speaking participants, including TB patients, and others involved in research, care or decision-making about TB diagnostics. We used the thematic approach to code and analyse the interview transcripts.
Results: We interviewed 31 participants. Our study showed that stakeholders had different expectations with regard to test impact and how it is measured. TB test impact studies were perceived to be important for supporting implementation of tests but there were concerns about the unrealistic expectations placed on tests to improve outcomes in health systems with many influencing factors. To improve TB test impact studies, respondents suggested conducting health system assessments prior to the study; developing clear guidance on the study methodology and interpretation; improving study design by describing questions and interventions that consider the influences of the health-care ecosystem on the diagnostic test; selecting the target population at the health-care level most likely to benefit from the test; setting realistic targets for effect sizes in the sample size calculations; and interpreting study results carefully and avoiding categorisation and interpretation of results based on statistical significance alone. Researchers should involve multiple stakeholders in the design of studies. Advocating for more funding to support robust studies is essential.
Conclusion: TB test impact studies were perceived to be important to support implementation of tests but there were concerns about their complexity. Process evaluations of their health system context and guidance for their design and interpretation are recommended.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WF Respiratory System > Tuberculosis > WF 200 Tuberculosis (General)
WF Respiratory System > Tuberculosis > WF 220 Diagnosis. Prognosis
WF Respiratory System > Lungs > WF 600 Lungs
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15551.1
Depositing User: Christianne Esparza
Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2019 11:13
Last Modified: 18 Dec 2019 11:13
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/13342

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item