LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Cost-effectiveness of WHO Problem Management Plus for adults with mood and anxiety disorders in a post-conflict area of Pakistan: randomised controlled trial

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Hamdani, Syed Usman, Huma, Zill-e-, Rahman, Atif, Wang, Duolao ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2788-2464, Chen, Tao ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5489-6450, van Ommeren, Mark, Chisholm, Dan and Farooq, Saeed (2020) 'Cost-effectiveness of WHO Problem Management Plus for adults with mood and anxiety disorders in a post-conflict area of Pakistan: randomised controlled trial'. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, pp. 1-7. (In Press)

[img] Text
BJP_2020 - DWang.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 28 January 2021.

Download (773kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the development of evidence-based interventions for treatment of priority mental health conditions in humanitarian settings, it is important to establish the cost-effectiveness of such interventions to enable their scale-up.

AIMS

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention compared with enhanced usual care (EUC) for common mental disorders in primary healthcare in Peshawar, Pakistan. Trial registration ACTRN12614001235695 (anzctr.org.au).

METHOD

We randomly allocated 346 participants to either PM+ (n = 172) or EUC (n = 174). Effectiveness was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 3 months post-intervention. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed as incremental costs (measured in Pakistani rupees, PKR) per unit change in anxiety, depression and functioning scores.

RESULTS

The total cost of delivering PM+ per participant was estimated at PKR 16 967 (US$163.14) using an international trainer and supervisor, and PKR 3645 (US$35.04) employing a local trainer. The mean cost per unit score improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms on the HADS was PKR 2957 (95% CI 2262-4029) (US$28) with an international trainer/supervisor and PKR 588 (95% CI 434-820) (US$6) with a local trainer/supervisor. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to successfully treat a case of depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) using an international supervisor was PKR 53 770 (95% CI 39 394-77 399) (US$517), compared with PKR 10 705 (95% CI 7731-15 627) (US$102.93) using a local supervisor.

CONCLUSIONS

The PM+ intervention was more effective but also more costly than EUC in reducing symptoms of anxiety, depression and improving functioning in adults impaired by psychological distress in a post-conflict setting of Pakistan.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: W General Medicine. Health Professions > W 74 Medical economics. Health care costs
WA Public Health > Health Problems of Special Population Groups > WA 395 Health in developing countries
WM Psychiatry > WM 100 General works
WM Psychiatry > WM 140 Mental disorders (General)
WM Psychiatry > WM 20 Research (General)
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > Clinical Sciences Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.138
Depositing User: Stacy Murtagh
Date Deposited: 25 Aug 2020 12:15
Last Modified: 25 Aug 2020 12:15
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/15423

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item