LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Contemporary gene flow between wild An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Weetman, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-1388, Steen, Keith ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-8643, Rippon, Emily, Mawejje, Henry D, Donnelly, Martin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-1497 and Wilding, Craig (2014) 'Contemporary gene flow between wild An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis'. Parasites & Vectors, Vol 7, e345.

[img]
Preview
Text
Para_Vect_7_345.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (527kB)

Abstract

Background

In areas where the morphologically indistinguishable malaria mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae Giles and An. arabiensis Patton are sympatric, hybrids are detected occasionally via species-diagnostic molecular assays. An. gambiae and An. arabiensis exhibit both pre- and post-reproductive mating barriers, with swarms largely species-specific and male F1 (first-generation) hybrids sterile. Consequently advanced-stage hybrids (back-crosses to parental species), which would represent a route for potentially-adaptive introgression, are expected to be very rare in natural populations. Yet the use of one or two physically linked single-locus diagnostic assays renders them indistinguishable from F1 hybrids and levels of interspecific gene flow are unknown.

Methods

We used data from over 350 polymorphic autosomal SNPs to investigate post F1 gene flow via patterns of genomic admixture between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis from eastern Uganda. Simulations were used to investigate the statistical power to detect hybrids with different levels of crossing and to identify the hybrid category significantly admixed genotypes could represent.

Results

A range of admixture proportions were detected for 11 field-collected hybrids identified via single-locus species-diagnostic PCRs. Comparison of admixture data with simulations indicated that at least seven of these hybrids were advanced generation crosses, with backcrosses to each species identified. In addition, of 36 individuals typing as An. gambiae or An. arabiensis that exhibited outlying admixture proportions, ten were identified as significantly mixed backcrosses, and at least four of these were second or third generation crosses.

Conclusions

Our results show that hybrids detected using standard diagnostics will often be hybrid generations beyond F1, and that in our study area around 5% (95% confidence intervals 3%-9%) of apparently ‘pure’ species samples may also be backcrosses. This is likely an underestimate because of rapidly-declining detection power beyond the first two backcross generations. Post-F1 gene flow occurs at a far from inconsequential rate between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and, especially for traits under strong selection, could readily lead to adaptive introgression of genetic variants relevant for vector control.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/7/1/345
Subjects: QU Biochemistry > Genetics > QU 470 Genetic structures
QU Biochemistry > Genetics > QU 500 Genetic phenomena
QX Parasitology > Insects. Other Parasites > QX 515 Anopheles
QX Parasitology > Insects. Other Parasites > QX 600 Insect control. Tick control
Faculty: Department: Biological Sciences > Vector Biology Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-345
Depositing User: Carmel Bates
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2014 10:02
Last Modified: 22 Feb 2018 16:14
URI: http://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/4582

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item