LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

A practical and systematic approach to collaborative institutional capacity strengthening based on evidence and experience

Bates, Imelda ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-8199, Boyd, A., Smith, Helen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6252-3793, Aslanyan, G. and Cole, D.C. (2013) 'A practical and systematic approach to collaborative institutional capacity strengthening based on evidence and experience'. Tropical Medicine & International Health, Vol 18, Issue S1, p. 33.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background

Formulating a general approach for planning capacity strengthening (CS) activities in low and middle income countries (LMICs) is complex because each programme is unique and quality evidence to guide planning is scarce. Funder commissioned CS evaluations may contain useful informationbut lessons have generally not been synthesized or shared. CS efforts usually begin with a ‘needs assessment’ but this starting point ignores two critical steps on the pathway to change - defining expected outcomes and describing the optimal capacity needed to achieve the outcomes.

Methods

We have used established research methods to extract information from peer-reviewed publications on CS
evaluations. We have also systematically analysed funding agencies’ reports of CS evaluations and surveyed and interviewed agencies’ representatives. We identified whether the evidence we extracted referred to CS of individuals, institutions or networks; we described the frameworks, indicators and processes used in the evaluations. We used this evidence combined with our extensive experience of CS in LMICs to design an evidence based, 5-step approach for planning and evaluating CS programmes. We tested this approach in different LMIC contexts and demonstrated its transferability. The 5-steps comprise: define the goal/objectives of the CS effort, describe the optimal capacity needed to achieve the goal/objectives, determine existing capacity gaps compared to the optimal, devise an action plan to fill the gaps with monitoring indicators, and adapt the plan and indicators as the programme matures.

Results and Discussion

We identified 593 peer-reviewed publications that focused on CS evaluations. 31 (5%) were primary studies; only four were from LMICs. Analysis of funding agencies’ reports showed that evaluation frameworks were diverse, usually not theory-based and were often geared towards monitoring funder’s own performance. Quantitative and qualitative monitoring indicators were used though few would meet SMART criteria, particularly at the institutional and network levels. We learnt that to manage expectations, avoid potential tensions and maximise learning, funders, evaluators and programme implementers should participate in CS planning and evaluation, and sustainability plans should be incorporated from the outset. Our evidence-based 5-step pathway involves ongoing participation of stakeholders and incorporates regular learning opportunities. It focuses on institutional processes as well as individuals and the wider system in which the institution operates. It defines the goal/objectives and describes the optimal capacity required prior to the needs assessment, and produces a measurable and flexible action plan to bridge capacity gaps.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Invited Speaker's Abstract IS.4.3.1.001 from Special Issue: Abstracts of the 8th European Congress on Tropical Medicine and International Health & 5th Conference of the Scandinavian-Baltic Society for Parasitology, 10–13 September 2013, Copenhagen, Denmark
Subjects: WA Public Health > WA 105 Epidemiology
WA Public Health > WA 30 Socioeconomic factors in public health (General)
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 540 National and state health administration
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 546 Local Health Administration. Community Health Services
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12161
Depositing User: Lynn Roberts-Maloney
Date Deposited: 13 Feb 2015 15:35
Last Modified: 06 Feb 2018 13:08
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/4897

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item