LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Kamuya, Dorcas M, Molyneux, Catherine S and Theobald, Sally ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-211X (2017) 'Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice'. BMJ Global Health, Vol 2, Issue 2, e000320.

[img]
Preview
Text
e000320.full.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (351kB) | Preview

Abstract

There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WA Public Health > WA 20.5 Research (General)
WA Public Health > Health Problems of Special Population Groups > WA 395 Health in developing countries
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 546 Local Health Administration. Community Health Services
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320
Depositing User: Stacy Murtagh
Date Deposited: 16 Aug 2017 16:03
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2017 11:21
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/7487

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item