LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Expanding the Vector Control Toolbox for Malaria Elimination: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Williams, Yasmin A, Tusting, Lucy S, Hocini, Sophia, Graves, Patricia, Killeen, Gerry, Kleinschmidt, Immo, Okumu, Fredros O, Feachem, Richard G A, Tatarsky, Allison and Gosling, Roly D (2018) 'Expanding the Vector Control Toolbox for Malaria Elimination: A Systematic Review of the Evidence'. Advances in Parasitology, Vol 99, pp. 345-379.

[img]
Preview
Text
Advances in parasitology_Expanding the vector control toolbox_accepted.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (590kB) | Preview

Abstract

Additional vector control tools (VCTs) are needed to supplement insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) to achieve malaria elimination in many settings. To identify options for expanding the malaria vector control toolbox, we conducted a systematic review of the availability and quality of the evidence for 21 malaria VCTs, excluding ITNs and IRS. Six electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched from January 1, 1980 to September 28, 2015 to identify systematic reviews, Phase I-IV studies, and observational studies that measured the effect of malaria VCTs on epidemiological or entomological outcomes across any age groups in all malaria-endemic settings. Eligible studies were summarized qualitatively, with quality and risk of bias assessments undertaken where possible. Of 17,912 studies screened, 155 were eligible for inclusion and were included in a qualitative synthesis. Across the 21 VCTs, we found considerable heterogeneity in the volume and quality of evidence, with 7 VCTs currently supported by at least one Phase III community-level evaluation measuring parasitologically confirmed malaria incidence or infection prevalence (insecticide-treated clothing and blankets, insecticide-treated hammocks, insecticide-treated livestock, larval source management (LSM), mosquito-proofed housing, spatial repellents, and topical repellents). The remaining VCTs were supported by one or more Phase II (n=13) or Phase I evaluation (n=1). Overall the quality of the evidence base remains greatest for LSM and topical repellents, relative to the other VCTs evaluated, although existing evidence indicates that topical repellents are unlikely to provide effective population-level protection against malaria. Despite substantial gaps in the supporting evidence, several VCTs may be promising supplements to ITNs and IRS in appropriate settings. Strengthening operational capacity and research to implement underutilized VCTs, such as LSM and mosquito-proofed housing, using an adaptive, learning-by-doing approach, while expanding the evidence base for promising supplementary VCTs that are locally tailored, should be considered central to global malaria elimination efforts.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WA Public Health > Preventive Medicine > WA 240 Disinfection. Disinfestation. Pesticides (including diseases caused by)
WC Communicable Diseases > Tropical and Parasitic Diseases > WC 750 Malaria
WC Communicable Diseases > Tropical and Parasitic Diseases > WC 765 Prevention and control
Faculty: Department: Biological Sciences > Department of Tropical Disease Biology
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2018.01.003
SWORD Depositor: JISC Pubrouter
Depositing User: Martin Chapman
Date Deposited: 26 Mar 2018 13:54
Last Modified: 27 Feb 2019 02:02
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/8402

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item