LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

“Sometimes it is difficult for us to stand up and change this”: an analysis of power within priority-setting for health following devolution in Kenya

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

McCollum, Rosalind, Taegtmeyer, Miriam ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-2536, Otiso, Lilian, Muturi, Nelly, Barasa, Edwine, Molyneux, Sassy, Martineau, Tim and Theobald, Sally ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-211X (2018) '“Sometimes it is difficult for us to stand up and change this”: an analysis of power within priority-setting for health following devolution in Kenya'. BMC Health Services Research, Vol 18, Issue 1.

[img]
Preview
Text
miriam.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Text
Manuscript_changes accepted_261018.docx - Accepted Version

Download (99kB)

Abstract

Background
Practices of power lie at the heart of policy processes. In both devolution and priority-setting, actors seek to exert power through influence and control over material, human, intellectual and financial resources. Priority-setting arises as a consequence of the needs and demand exceeding the resources available, requiring some means of choosing between competing demands. This paper examines the use of power within priority-setting processes for healthcare resources at sub-national level, following devolution in Kenya.

Methods
We interviewed 14 national level key informants and 255 purposively selected respondents from across the health system in ten counties. These qualitative data were supplemented by 14 focus group discussions (FGD) involving 146 community members in two counties. We conducted a power analysis using Gaventa’s power cube and Veneklasen’s expressions of power to interpret our findings.

Results
We found Kenya’s transition towards devolution is transforming the former centralised balance of power, leading to greater ability for influence at the county level, reduced power at national and sub-county (district) levels, and limited change at community level. Within these changing power structures, politicians are felt to play a greater role in priority-setting for health. The interfaces and tensions between politicians, health service providers and the community has at times been felt to undermine health related technical priorities. Underlying social structures and discriminatory practices generally continue unchanged, leading to the continued exclusion of the most vulnerable from priority-setting processes.

Conclusions
Power analysis of priority-setting at county level after devolution in Kenya highlights the need for stronger institutional structures, processes and norms to reduce the power imbalances between decision-making actors and to enable community participation.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WA Public Health > WA 30 Socioeconomic factors in public health (General)
WA Public Health > Health Problems of Special Population Groups > WA 395 Health in developing countries
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 540 National and state health administration
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3706-5
Depositing User: Stacy Murtagh
Date Deposited: 17 Dec 2018 15:32
Last Modified: 14 Feb 2019 16:55
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/9793

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item