LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Stakeholder perspectives from 15 countries in Africa on barriers in snakebite envenoming research and the potential role of research hubs

Stienstra, Ymkje ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-8859, Aglanu, Leslie Mawuli, Schurer, Janna M., Mijumbi, Rhona, Mbonigaba, Jean Bosco, Habib, Abdulrazaq G., Thomas, Brent ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-5429, Steinhorst, Jonathan, Thomson, Rachael, Padidar, Sara, Amuasi, John H., Oluoch, George and Lalloo, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-2200 (2023) 'Stakeholder perspectives from 15 countries in Africa on barriers in snakebite envenoming research and the potential role of research hubs'. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 17, Issue 12, e0011838.

[img]
Preview
Text
pntd.0011838.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (908kB) | Preview

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming is a debilitating neglected tropical disease disproportionately affecting the rural poor in low and middle-income countries in the tropics and sub-tropics. Critical questions and gaps in public health and policy need to be addressed if major progress is to be made towards reducing the negative impact of snakebite, particularly in the World Health Organisation (WHO) Africa region. We engaged key stakeholders to identify barriers to evidence-based snakebite decision making and to explore how development of research and policy hubs could help to overcome these barriers. We conducted an electronic survey among 73 stakeholders from ministries of health, health facilities, academia and non-governmental organizations from 15 countries in the WHO Africa region. The primary barriers to snakebite research and subsequent policy translation were limited funds, lack of relevant data, and lack of interest from policy makers. Adequate funding commitment, strong political will, building expert networks and a demand for scientific evidence were all considered potential factors that could facilitate snakebite research. Participants rated availability of antivenoms, research skills training and disease surveillance as key research priorities. All participants indicated interest in the development of research and policy hubs and 78% indicated their organization would be willing to actively participate. In conclusion, our survey affirms that relevant stakeholders in the field of snakebite perceive research and policy hubs as a promising development, which could help overcome the barriers to pursuing the WHO goals and targets for reducing the burden of snakebite.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: QW Microbiology and Immunology > Antigens and Antibodies. Toxins and Antitoxins > QW 630 Toxins. Antitoxins
WD Disorders of Systemic, Metabolic or Environmental Origin, etc > Animal Poisons > WD 410 Reptiles
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > Clinical Sciences Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011838
SWORD Depositor: JISC Pubrouter
Depositing User: JISC Pubrouter
Date Deposited: 17 Jan 2024 14:11
Last Modified: 17 Jan 2024 14:11
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/23751

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item