A cross-sectional survey to establish Theileria parva prevalence and vector control at the wildlife-livestock interface, Northern Tanzania

Allan, Fiona K., Sindoya, Emmanuel, Adam, Katherine E., Byamungu, Mechtilda, Lea, Rachel, Lord, Jennifer, Mbata, Geofrey, Paxton, Edith, Mramba, Furaha, Torr, Steve ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-4030, Morrison, W. Ivan, Handel, Ian, Morrison, Liam J. and Auty, Harriet K. (2021) 'A cross-sectional survey to establish Theileria parva prevalence and vector control at the wildlife-livestock interface, Northern Tanzania'. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol 196, p. 105491.

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S016758772100235X-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

East Coast fever (ECF) in cattle is caused by the protozoan parasite Theileria parva, transmitted by Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks. In cattle ECF is often fatal, causing annual losses >$500 million across its range. The African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) is the natural host for T. parva but the transmission dynamics between wild hosts and livestock are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of T. parva in cattle, in a 30 km zone adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania where livestock and buffalo co-exist, and to ascertain how livestock keepers controlled ECF and other vector-borne diseases of cattle.

A randomised cross-sectional cattle survey and questionnaire of vector control practices were conducted. Blood samples were collected from 770 cattle from 48 herds and analysed by PCR to establish T. parva prevalence. Half body tick counts were recorded on every animal. Farmers were interviewed (n = 120; including the blood sampled herds) using a standardised questionnaire to obtain data on vector control practices. Local workshops were held to discuss findings and validate results.

Overall prevalence of T. parva in cattle was 5.07% (CI: 3.70−7.00%), with significantly higher prevalence in older animals. Although all farmers reported seeing ticks on their cattle, tick counts were very low with 78% cattle having none. Questionnaire analysis indicated significant acaricide use with 79% and 41% of farmers reporting spraying or dipping with cypermethrin-based insecticides, respectively. Some farmers reported very frequent spraying, as often as every four days. However, doses per animal were often insufficient.

These data indicate high levels of acaricide use, which may be responsible for the low observed tick burdens and low ECF prevalence. This vector control is farmer-led and aimed at both tick- and tsetse-borne diseases of livestock. The levels of acaricide use raise concerns regarding sustainability; resistance development is a risk, particularly in ticks. Integrating vaccination as part of this community-based disease control may alleviate acaricide dependence, but increased understanding of the Theileria strains circulating in wildlife-livestock interface areas is required to establish the potential benefits of vaccination.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	QX Parasitology > QX 4 General works QX Parasitology > QX 45 Host-parasite relations QX Parasitology > Arthropods > QX 479 Ticks
Faculty: Department:	Biological Sciences > Vector Biology Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105491
Depositing User:	Samantha Sheldrake
Date Deposited:	24 Nov 2021 15:21
Last Modified:	24 Nov 2021 15:21
URI:	https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/19501

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item