LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Innovative approach to improve information accuracy in a two-district cross-sectional study in Bihar, India

Jeffery, Caroline ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-0708, Pagano, Marcello, Devkota, Baburam and Valadez, Joseph ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-6592 (2022) 'Innovative approach to improve information accuracy in a two-district cross-sectional study in Bihar, India'. BMJ Open, Vol 12, Issue 1, e051427.

[img]
Preview
Text
e051427.full.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective
Combine Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) and probability survey data using the statistical annealing technique (AT) to produce more accurate health coverage estimates than either source of data and a measure of HMIS data error.

Setting
This study is set in Bihar, the fifth poorest state in India, where half the population lives below the poverty line. An important source of data, used by health professionals for programme decision making, is routine health facility or HMIS data. Its quality is sometimes poor or unknown, and has no measure of its uncertainty. Using AT, we combine district-level HMIS and probability survey data (n=475) for the first time for 10 indicators assessing antenatal care, institutional delivery and neonatal care from 11 blocks of Aurangabad and 14 blocks of Gopalganj districts (N=6 253 965) in Bihar state, India.

Participants
Both districts are rural. Bihar is 82.7% Hindu and 16.9% Islamic.

Primary outcome measures
Survey prevalence measures for 10 indicators, corresponding prevalences using HMIS data, combined prevalences calculated with AT and SEs for each type of data.

Results
The combined and survey estimates differ by <0.10. The combined and HMIS estimates differ by up to 84.2%, with the HMIS having 1.4–32.3 times larger error. Of 20 HMIS versus survey coverage estimate comparisons across the two districts only five differed by <0.10. Of 250 subdistrict-level comparisons of HMIS versus combined estimates, only 36.4% of the HMIS estimates are within the 95% CI of the combined estimate.

Conclusions
Our statistical innovation increases the accuracy of information available for local health system decision making, allows evaluation of indicator accuracy and increases the accuracy of HMIS estimates. The combined estimates with a measure of error better informs health system professionals about their risks when using HMIS estimates, so they can reduce waste by making better decisions. Our results show that AT is an effective method ready for additional international assessment while also being used to provide affordable information to improve health services.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WA Public Health > WA 30 Socioeconomic factors in public health (General)
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 546 Local Health Administration. Community Health Services
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 590 Health education, Health communication
WA Public Health > Statistics. Surveys > WA 900 Public health statistics
WA Public Health > Statistics. Surveys > WA 950 Theory or methods of medical statistics. Epidemiologic methods
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051427
Depositing User: Rachel Dominguez
Date Deposited: 03 Feb 2022 11:46
Last Modified: 03 Feb 2022 11:46
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/19901

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item