Tools
Tools
Azizi, Salum, Snetselaar, Janneke, Kaaya, Robert, Matowo, Johnson, Onen, Hudson, Shayo, Magreth, Kisengwa, Ezekia, Tilya, Evod, Manunda, Baltazari, Mawa, Benson, Mosha, Franklin and Kirby, Matthew (2022) 'Implementing OECD GLP principles for the evaluation of novel vector control tools: a case study with two novel LLINs, SafeNet® and SafeNet NF®'. Malaria Journal, Vol 21, Issue 1, e183.
|
Text
Implementing OECD GLP principles for the evaluation of novel vector control tools_JS.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: To sustain high universal Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) coverage, affordable nets that provide equivalent or better protection than standard LLINs, are required. Test facilities evaluating new LLINs require compliance to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards to ensure the quality and integrity of test data. Following GLP principles allows for the reconstruction of activities during the conduct of a study and minimizes duplication of efficacy testing. This case study evaluated the efficacy of two LLINs: SafeNet NF® and SafeNet® LLIN.
Methods: The study was conducted according to GLP principles and followed World Health Organization guidelines for evaluating LLINs. The LLINs were assessed in experimental huts against wild, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes. Nets were either unwashed or washed 20 times and artificially holed to simulate a used torn net. Blood-feeding inhibition and mortality were compared with a positive control (Interceptor® LLIN) and an untreated net.
Results: Mosquito entry in the huts was reduced compared to negative control for the unwashed SafeNet NF, washed Safenet LLIN and the positive control arms. Similar exiting rates were found for all the treatment arms. Significant blood-feeding inhibition was only found for the positive control, both when washed and unwashed. All insecticide treatments induced significantly higher mortality compared to an untreated net. Compared to the positive control, the washed and unwashed SafeNet NF® resulted in similar mortality. For the SafeNet® LLINs the unwashed net had an equivalent performance, but the mortality for the washed net was significantly lower than the positive control. Internal audits of the study confirmed that all critical phases complied with Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and the study plan. The external audit confirmed that the study complied with GLP standards.
Conclusions: SafeNet NF® and SafeNet® LLIN offered equivalent protection to the positive control (Interceptor® LLIN). However, further research is needed to investigate the durability, acceptability, and residual efficacy of these nets in the community. This study demonstrated that GLP-compliant evaluation of LLINs can be successfully conducted by African research institutions
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | NOT_LSTM |
| Subjects: | QX Parasitology > Insects. Other Parasites > QX 600 Insect control. Tick control QX Parasitology > Insects. Other Parasites > QX 650 Insect vectors WA Public Health > Preventive Medicine > WA 240 Disinfection. Disinfestation. Pesticides (including diseases caused by) WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 530 International health administration |
| Faculty: Department: | IVCC |
| Digital Object Identifer (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04208-4 |
| Depositing User: | Helen Fletcher |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Jun 2022 09:47 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Nov 2024 08:32 |
| URI: | https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/20591 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |