Tools
Tools
Alhassan, Yussif 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4155-546X, Zaizay, Zeela, Dean, Laura ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-9707, McCollum, Rosalind, Watson, Victoria, Kollie, Karsor, Piotrowski, Helen, Hastie, Olivia, Parker, Colleen, Dacombe, Russell ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6705-1537, Theobald, Sally ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-211X and Taegtmeyer, Miriam ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-2536
(2023)
'Perceived impacts of COVID-19 responses on routine health service delivery in Liberia and UK: cross-country lessons for resilient health systems for equitable service delivery during pandemics'. BMC Health Services Research, Vol 23, Issue 1.
|
Text
Covid Impact paper_PUBLISHED.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background
COVID-19 has caused significant public health problems globally, with catastrophic impacts on health systems. This study explored the adaptations to health services in Liberia and Merseyside UK at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (January–May 2020) and their perceived impact on routine service delivery. During this period,
transmission routes and treatment pathways were as yet unknown, public fear and health care worker fear was high and death rates among vulnerable hospitalised patients were high. We aimed to identify cross-context lessons for building more resilient health systems during a pandemic response.
Methods
he study employed a cross-sectional qualitative design with a collective case study approach involving simultaneous comparison of COVID-19 response experiences in Liberia and Merseyside. Between June and September 2020, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 66 health system actors purposively selected across different levels of the health system. Participants included national and county decision-makers in Liberia, frontline health workers and regional and hospital decision-makers in Merseyside UK. Data were analysed thematically in NVivo 12 software.
Results
There were mixed impacts on routine services in both settings. Major adverse impacts included diminished availability and utilisation of critical health services for socially vulnerable populations, linked with reallocation of health service resources for COVID-19 care, and use of virtual medical consultation in Merseyside. Routine service delivery during the pandemic was hampered by a lack of clear communication, centralised planning, and limited local autonomy. Across both settings, cross-sectoral collaboration, community-based service delivery, virtual consultations, community engagement, culturally sensitive messaging, and local autonomy in response planning facilitated delivery of essential services.
Conclusion
Our findings can inform response planning to assure optimal delivery of essential routine health services during the early phases of public health emergencies. Pandemic responses should prioritise early preparedness, with investment in the health systems building blocks including staff training and PPE stocks, address both pre-existing and pandemic-related structural barriers to care, inclusive and participatory decision-making, strong community engagement, and effective and sensitive communication. Multisectoral collaboration and inclusive leadership are essential.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 546 Local Health Administration. Community Health Services WC Communicable Diseases > Virus Diseases > Viral Respiratory Tract Infections. Respirovirus Infections > WC 506 COVID-19 |
| Faculty: Department: | Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department |
| Digital Object Identifer (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09162-8 |
| Depositing User: | Rachel Dominguez |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Apr 2023 11:07 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Apr 2023 12:24 |
| URI: | https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/22295 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |