LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

“We are the heroes because we are ready to die for this country”: Participants' decision-making and grounded ethics in an Ebola vaccine clinical trial

Tengbeh, Angus Fayia, Enria, Luisa, Smout, Elizabeth, Mooney, Thomas, Callaghan, Mike, Ishola, David, Leigh, Bailah, Watson-Jones, Deborah, Greenwood, Brian, Larson, Heidi and Lees, Shelley (2018) '“We are the heroes because we are ready to die for this country”: Participants' decision-making and grounded ethics in an Ebola vaccine clinical trial'. Social Science & Medicine, Vol 203, Issue April 2018, pp. 35-42.

[img]
Preview
Text
6. Tengbeh ea 2018 - 1-s2.0-S0277953618301011-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (225kB) | Preview

Abstract

The 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic presented a challenging setting in which to carry out clinical trials. This paper reports findings from social science research carried out in Kambia, Northern Sierra Leone during first year of an Ebola vaccine trial (August 2015–July 2016). The social science team collected data through ethnographic observation, 42 in depth interviews; 4 life narratives; 200 exit interviews; 31 key informant interviews; and 8 focus group discussions with trial participants and community members not enrolled in the trial. Whilst research often focuses on why people refuse vaccination, we instead explore participant motivations for volunteering for the study, in spite of prevailing anxieties, rumours and mistrust during and after the Ebola outbreak. In so doing the paper contributes to on-going debates about research ethics and community engagement in resource poor contexts, offering reflections from an emergency and post-epidemic setting. We analyse participants' perceptions of the risks and benefits of participations, highlighting the importance of a contextual approach. We focus on four types of motivation: altruism; curiosity and hope; health-seeking; and notions of exchange, and argue for the role of social science in developing grounded research ethics and community engagement strategies that can take into account context and local realities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: NOT_LSTM
Subjects: QW Microbiology and Immunology > Immunotherapy and Hypersensitivity > QW 806 Vaccination
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.008
Depositing User: Rachel Dominguez
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2023 08:34
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2023 08:34
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/22630

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item