A network of empirical ethics teams embedded in research programmes across multiple sites: opportunities and challenges in contributing to COVID-19 research and responses

Ngwenya, Nothando, Ilo Van Nuil, Jennifer, Nyirenda, Deborah, Chambers, Mary, Cheah, Phaik Yeong, Seeley, Janet, Chi, Primus, Mafuleka, Lindiwe, Nkosi, Busisiwe, Kamuya, Dorcas, Davies, Alun, Schneiders, Mira L, Mumba, Noni, Dlamini, Siphephelo, Desmond, Nicola ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-8569, Marsh, Vicki, Rippon, Dinnah, Parker, Michael and Molyneux, Sassy (2023) 'A network of empirical ethics teams embedded in research programmes across multiple sites: opportunities and challenges in contributing to COVID-19 research and responses'. Wellcome Open Research, Vol 7, e48.

Preview

Text a6b59ba3-c89b-4982-970b-6320e3dee96b_17548_-_sassy_molyneux_v2.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Covid-19 continues to teach the global community important lessons about preparedness for research and effective action to respond to emerging health threats. We share the COVID-19 experiences of a pre-existing cross-site ethics network-the Global Health Bioethics Network-which brings together researchers and practitioners from Africa, Europe, and Southeast Asia. We describe the network and its members and activities, and the work-related opportunities and challenges we faced over a one-year period during the pandemic. We highlight the value of having strong and long-term empirical ethics networks embedded across diverse research institutions to be able to: 1) identify and share relevant ethics challenges and research questions and ways of ’doing research’; 2) work with key stakeholders to identify appropriate ways to contribute to the emerging health issue response – e.g., through ethics oversight, community engagement, and advisory roles at different levels; and 3) learn from each other and from diverse contexts to advocate for positive change at multiple levels. It is our view that being embedded and long term offers opportunities in terms of deep institutional and contextual knowledge, existing relationships and access to a wide range of stakeholders. Being networked offers opportunities to draw upon a wide range of expertise and perspectives, and to bring together internal and external insights (i.e. drawing on different positionalities). Long term funding means that the people and resources are in place and ready to respond in a timely way. However, many tensions and challenges remain, including difficulties in negotiating power and politics in the roles that researchers and research institutions can and should play in an emergency, and the position of empirical ethics within research programmes. We discuss some of these tensions and challenges and consider the implications for our own and similar networks in future.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	NOT_LSTM
Subjects:	WC Communicable Diseases > WC 20 Research (General) WC Communicable Diseases > Virus Diseases > Viral Respiratory Tract Infections. Respirovirus Infections > WC 506 COVID-19
Faculty: Department:	Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department Clinical Sciences & International Health > Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Programme (MLW)
Digital Object Identifer (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17548.2
Depositing User:	Rachel Dominguez
Date Deposited:	22 Jun 2023 11:11
Last Modified:	01 Nov 2024 12:12
URI:	https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/22666

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item