LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Quality of vital event data for infant mortality estimation in prospective, population-based studies: An analysis of secondary data from Asia, Africa, and Latin America

Erchick, Daniel J, Subedi, Seema, Verhulst, Andrea, Guillot, Michel, Adair, Linda S, Barros, Aluísio J D, Chasekwa, Bernard, Christian, Parul, da Silva, Bruna Gonçalves C., Silveira, Mariângela F, Hallal, Pedro C, Humphrey, Jean H, Huybregts, Lieven, Kariuki, Simon, Khatry, Subarna K, Lachat, Carl, Matijasevich, Alicia, McElroy, Peter D, Menezes, Ana M B, Mullany, Luke C, Perez, Tita Lorna L, Phillips-Howard, Penelope, Roberfroid, Dominique, Santos, Ina S, terKuile, Feiko ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3663-5617, Thulasiraj, Ravilla D, Tielsch, James M, Wu, Lee S F and Katz, Joanne (2023) 'Quality of vital event data for infant mortality estimation in prospective, population-based studies: An analysis of secondary data from Asia, Africa, and Latin America'. Population Health Metrics, Vol 21, e10.

[img]
Preview
Text
s12963-023-00309-7.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Infant and neonatal mortality estimates are typically derived from retrospective birth histories collected through surveys in countries with unreliable civil registration and vital statistics systems. Yet such data are subject to biases, including under-reporting of deaths and age misreporting, which impact mortality estimates. Prospective pPopulation-based cohort studies are an under-utilized data source for mortality estimation that may offer strengths that avoid biases.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group, including 11 11 population-based pregnancy or birth cohort studies, to evaluate the appropriateness of vital event data for mortality estimation. Analyses were descriptive, summarizing study designs, populations, protocols, and internal checks to assess their impact on data quality. We calculated infant and neonatal morality rates and compared patterns with Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data.

Results: Studies yielded 71,760 pregnant women and 85,095 live births. Specific field protocols, especially pregnancy enrollment, limited exclusion criteria, and frequent follow-up visits after delivery, led to higher birth outcome ascertainment and fewer missing deaths. Most studies achieved had low follow-up loss in pregnancy and the first month with little evidence of date heaping. Among studies in Asia and Latin America, nNeonatal mortality rates (NMR) between the cohorts and DHS appeared similar in Asia and Latin Americawere similar to DHS, while several studies in and lower in Sub-Saharan Africa Africahad lower NMRs than DHS. Infant mortality varied by study and region between sources.

Conclusions: Prospective, pPopulation-based cohort studies following rigorous protocols can yield high-quality vital event data to improve characterization of detailed mortality patterns of infants in low- and middle-income countriesLMICs, especially in the early neonatal period where mortality risk is highest and changes rapidly.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WS Pediatrics > By Age Groups > WS 430 Infancy
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > Clinical Sciences Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00309-7
Depositing User: Jane Rawlinson
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2023 08:52
Last Modified: 14 Nov 2023 14:10
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/22855

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item