Tools
Tools
Mavhu, Webster 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1881-4398, Larke, Natasha, Hatzold, Karin, Ncube, Getrude, Weiss, Helen A., Mangenah, Collin, Mugurungi, Owen, Mufuka, Juliet, Samkange, Christopher A., Sherman, Judith, Gwinji, Gerald, Cowan, Frances M. and Ticklay, Ismail
(2015)
'Implementation and Operational Research
A Randomized Noninferiority Trial of AccuCirc Device Versus Mogen Clamp for Early Infant Male Circumcision in Zimbabwe'. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Vol 69, Issue 5, e156-e163.
Abstract
Background:
Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) is a potential key HIV prevention intervention, providing it can be safely and efficiently implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. Here, we present results of a randomized noninferiority trial of EIMC comparing the AccuCirc device with Mogen clamp in Zimbabwe.
Methods:
Between January and June 2013, eligible infants were randomized to EIMC through either AccuCirc or Mogen clamp conducted by a doctor, using a 2:1 allocation ratio. Participants were followed for 14 days post-EIMC. Primary outcomes for the trial were EIMC safety and acceptability.
Results:
One hundred fifty male infants were enrolled in the trial and circumcised between 6 and 54 days postpartum (n = 100 AccuCirc; n = 50 Mogen clamp). Twenty-six infants (17%) were born to HIV-infected mothers. We observed 2 moderate adverse events (AEs) [2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2 to 7.0] in the AccuCirc arm and none (95% CI: 0.0 to 7.1) in the Mogen clamp arm. The cumulative incident risk of AEs was 2.0% higher in the AccuCirc arm compared with the Mogen Clamp arm (95% CI: −0.7 to 4.7). As the 95% CI excludes the predefined noninferiority margin of 6%, the result provides evidence of noninferiority of AccuCirc compared with the Mogen clamp. Nearly all mothers (99.5%) reported great satisfaction with the outcome. All mothers, regardless of arm said they would recommend EIMC to other parents, and would circumcise their next son.
Conclusions:
This first randomized trial of AccuCirc versus Mogen clamp for EIMC demonstrated that EIMC using these devices is safe and acceptable to parents. There was no difference in the rate of AEs by device.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | NOT_LSTM |
| Subjects: | WJ Urogenital System > WJ 20 Research (General) WS Pediatrics > WS 20 Research (General) |
| Digital Object Identifer (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000694 |
| Depositing User: | Lynn Roberts-Maloney |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Mar 2024 15:38 |
| Last Modified: | 26 Mar 2024 15:38 |
| URI: | https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/24267 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |