LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

An assessment of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling to evaluate malaria outcome indicators: extending malaria indicator surveys.

Biedron, Caitlin, Pagano, Marcello, Hedt, Bethany L, Kilian, Albert, Ratcliffe, Amy, Mabunda, Samuel and Valadez, Joseph ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-6592 (2010) 'An assessment of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling to evaluate malaria outcome indicators: extending malaria indicator surveys.'. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 39, Issue 1, pp. 72-9.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Large investments and increased global prioritization of malaria prevention and treatment have resulted in greater emphasis on programme monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in many countries. Many countries currently use large multistage cluster sample surveys to monitor malaria outcome indicators on a regional and national level. However, these surveys often mask local-level variability important to programme management. Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) has played a valuable role for local-level programme M&E. If incorporated into these larger surveys, it would provide a comprehensive M&E plan at little, if any, extra cost.

METHODS
The Mozambique Ministry of Health conducted a Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) in June and July 2007. We applied LQAS classification rules to the 345 sampled enumeration areas to demonstrate identifying high- and low-performing areas with respect to two malaria program indicators-'household possession of any bednet' and 'household possession of any insecticide-treated bednet (ITN)'.

RESULTS
As shown by the MIS, no province in Mozambique achieved the 70% coverage target for household possession of bednets or ITNs. By applying LQAS classification rules to the data, we identify 266 of the 345 enumeration areas as having bednet coverage severely below the 70% target. An additional 73 were identified with low ITN coverage.

CONCLUSIONS
This article demonstrates the feasibility of integrating LQAS into multistage cluster sampling surveys and using these results to support a comprehensive national, regional and local programme M&E system. Furthermore, in the recommendations we outlined how to integrate the Large Country-LQAS design into macro-surveys while still obtaining results available through current sampling practices.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WA Public Health > WA 105 Epidemiology
WA Public Health > Statistics. Surveys > WA 950 Theory or methods of medical statistics. Epidemiologic methods
WC Communicable Diseases > Tropical and Parasitic Diseases > WC 755 Epidemiology
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp363
Depositing User: Helen Fletcher
Date Deposited: 28 Jan 2013 16:45
Last Modified: 06 Sep 2019 11:29
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/3221

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item