LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: A prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries.

Vallières, Frédérique, Hyland, Philip, McAuliffe, Eilish, Mahmud, Ilias, Tulloch, Olivia, Walker, Polly and Taegtmeyer, Miriam ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-2536 (2018) 'A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: A prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries.'. BMC Health Services Research, Vol 18, Issue 806.

[img]
Preview
Text
BMCHSR_28092018_accepted.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (551kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background
The global scale-up of community health workers (CHWs) depends on supportive management and supervision of this expanding cadre. Existing tools fail to incorporate the perspective of the CHW (i.e. perceived supervision) in terms of supportive experiences with their supervisor. Aligned to the WHO’s strategy on human resources for health, we developed and validated a simple tool to measure perceived supervision across seven low and middle-income countries.
Methods
Phase 1 was carried out with 327 CHWs in Sierra Leone. Twelve questions, informed by the extant literature on health worker supervision, were reduced to six questions using confirmatory factor analysis. Phase 2 employed structural equation modelling with 741 CHWs in six countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique), to assess the factorial validity, predictive validity, and internal reliability of the questions at three time-points, over 8-months.
Results
We developed a robust, 6-item measure of perceived supervision (PSS), capturing regular contact, two-way communication, and joint problem-solving elements as being critical from the perspective of CHWs. When assessed across the six countries, over time, the PSS was also found to have good validity and internal reliability. PSS scores at baseline positively and significantly predicted a range of performance-related outcomes at follow-up.
Conclusion
The PSS is the first validated tool that measures supervisory experience from the perspective of CHWs and is applicable across multiple, culturally-distinct global health contexts with a wide range of CHW typologies. Simple, quick to administer, and freely available in eleven languages, the PSS could assist practitioners in the management of community health programmes.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: QS Anatomy > QS 20.5 Research (General)
WA Public Health > WA 30 Socioeconomic factors in public health (General)
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 525 General works
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 546 Local Health Administration. Community Health Services
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7
Depositing User: Stacy Murtagh
Date Deposited: 05 Nov 2018 16:26
Last Modified: 17 Oct 2019 10:52
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/9573

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item