Consortium management structures, processes, and approaches: The DELTAS Africa example

Tagoe, Nadia, Molyneux, Sassy, Pulford, Justin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-8480 and Kinyanjui, Sam (2022) 'Consortium management structures, processes, and approaches: The DELTAS Africa example'. Wellcome Open Research, Vol 7, e139.

Preview

Text 94ad5c79-7251-42b5-a6c4-ee32aa560142_17721_-_nadia_tagoe_(1).pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (665kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Global efforts to strengthen health research capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have intensified in the past few decades, and these efforts are often implemented by consortia. Our review of the literature indicated that reports on health research capacity strengthening (HRCS) consortia have primarily focused on programme outputs and outcomes while management processes and their contributions to consortia goals have received little attention. This qualitative study sought to identify the consortium management processes employed by 10 DELTAS Africa consortia, factors influencing these processes, and leaders’ consortium management experiences.

Methods: We conducted 24 key informant interviews with the directors and programme managers of all the 10 DELTAS Africa consortia, and funding actors who worked closely with the consortia. The interviews were supplemented by reviews of DELTAS and consortium-specific documents. Data were analysed using the content analysis approach.

Results: The consortia studied employed similar management processes but adopted different strategies in executing these processes. Study results indicate that decision-making in consortia is not always a straightforward process as leaders were often faced with dilemmas when determining management strategies to adopt, and often tried to balance multiple factors which were not always aligned. This was demonstrated as consortia selected partners, determined goals and activities, assigned roles and responsibilities, allocated resources, established governance and partner management systems, and coordinated and monitored consortia activities. Factors that influenced the choice of processes and approaches included previous experiences, funders expectations, and the pressure to deliver research outputs. Consortia’s unique approaches to management were due to varying contexts and influences and indicate that management decisions are nuanced and cannot easily be formularized.

Conclusion: The study has highlighted the importance of flexibility in consortium management and the need to generate research capacity strengthening (RCS)-specific guidance that can assist consortia in resolving dilemmas and making appropriate management decisions.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 540 National and state health administration
Faculty: Department:	Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17721.1
SWORD Depositor:	JISC Pubrouter
Depositing User:	JISC Pubrouter
Date Deposited:	22 Nov 2022 15:25
Last Modified:	14 Jun 2023 11:38
URI:	https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/20341

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item