Tools
Tools
de Siqueira Filha, Noemia Teixeira, Li, Jinshuo, Phillips-Howard, Penelope 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-116X, Quayyum, Zahidul, Kibuchi, Eliud, Mithu, Md Imran Hossain, Vidyasagaran, Aishwarya, Sai, Varun, Manzoor, Farzana, Karuga, Robinson, Awal, Abdul, Chumo, Ivy, Rao, Vinodkumar, Mberu, Blessing, Smith, John, Saidu, Samuel, Tolhurst, Rachel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3005-6641, Mazumdar, Sumit, Rosu, Laura, Garimella, Surekha and Elsey, Helen
(2022)
'The economics of healthcare access: a scoping review on the economic impact of healthcare access for vulnerable urban populations in low- and middle-income countries'. International Journal for Equity in Health, Vol 21, Issue 1, e191.
|
Text
12939_2022_Article_1804.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: The growing urban population imposes additional challenges for health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We explored the economic burden and inequities in healthcare utilisation across slum, non-slum and levels of wealth among urban residents in LMICs.
Methods: This scoping review presents a narrative synthesis and descriptive analysis of studies conducted in urban areas of LMICs. We categorised studies as conducted only in slums, city-wide studies with measures of wealth and conducted in both slums and non-slums settlements. We estimated the mean costs of accessing healthcare, the incidence of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) and the progressiveness and equity of health expenditures. The definitions of slums used in the studies were mapped against the 2018 UN-Habitat definition. We developed an evidence map to identify research gaps on the economics of healthcare access in LMICs.
Results: We identified 64 studies for inclusion, the majority of which were from South-East Asia (59%) and classified as city-wide (58%). We found severe economic burden across health conditions, wealth quintiles and study types. Compared with city-wide studies, slum studies reported higher direct costs of accessing health care for acute conditions and lower costs for chronic and unspecified health conditions. Healthcare expenditures for chronic conditions were highest amongst the richest wealth quintiles for slum studies and more equally distributed across all wealth quintiles for city-wide studies. The incidence of CHE was similar across all wealth quintiles in slum studies and concentrated among the poorest residents in city-wide studies. None of the definitions of slums used covered all characteristics proposed by UN-Habitat. The evidence map showed that city-wide studies, studies conducted in India and studies on unspecified health conditions dominated the current evidence on the economics of healthcare access. Most of the evidence was classified as poor quality.
Conclusions: Our findings indicated that city-wide and slums residents have different expenditure patterns when accessing healthcare. Financial protection schemes must consider the complexity of healthcare provision in the urban context. Further research is needed to understand the causes of inequities in healthcare expenditure in rapidly expanding and evolving cities in LMICs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | WA Public Health > WA 20.5 Research (General) WA Public Health > WA 30 Socioeconomic factors in public health (General) |
| Faculty: Department: | Clinical Sciences & International Health > Clinical Sciences Department Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department |
| Digital Object Identifer (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01804-3 |
| SWORD Depositor: | JISC Pubrouter |
| Depositing User: | JISC Pubrouter |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Jan 2023 12:12 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Jan 2023 12:12 |
| URI: | https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/21718 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |