Tools
Tools
Duda, Kirsten, D’Artibale, Alessia, Moombe, Miyanda, Lark, R.Murray and Pulford, Justin 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-8480
(2023)
'A mixed-methods evaluation of capacity strengthening within an international conservation agriculture research consortium'. F1000Research, Vol 12, e1119.
|
Text
9d2e8d0b-9194-45d9-a5cd-2dc4768d5591_139715_-_justin_pulford.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (482kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background:
The Strengthening Capacity in Environmental Physics, Hydrogeology and Statistics for conservation agriculture research (CEPHaS) consortium sought to to strengthen research capacity among a network of African and UK researchers, and their respective institutions, to fill knowledge gaps on the impacts of conservation agriculture practices on the water cycle in cultivated soils. We examined experiences of consortium membership and, drawing on this information, determined key recommendations for future programmes with similar objectives.
Methods:
A mixed methods study encompassing an online survey (N=40) and semi-structured interviews (N=19) completed between June 2021 and February 2022 with CEPHaS consortium members from Malawi, UK, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Survey and interview data were analysed separately, using univariate statistics and framework synthesis respectively.
Results:
Survey and interview findings were generally aligned, with both revealing a wide range of reported capacity strengthening gains resulting from CEPHaS engagement at both an individual and institutional level. Participants consistently expressed their CEPHaS involvement in positive terms with praise for the applied ‘learn by doing’ approach underpinning many of the activities as well as the engaging and highly inclusive leadership. There was evidence that the various trainings and resources provided through CEPHaS were valued, frequently utilised, and often transferred beyond the immediate CEPHaS membership for wider benefit. Resource provision and staff training were seen as foundational for long-term institutional benefits. Some challenges and suggested areas for improvement were reported by participants as were potential opportunities to facilitate greater impact.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest that the basic ‘template’ of the CEPHaS consortium provided a strong basis for research capacity strengthening in Conservation Agriculture, especially at the level of individual researchers, and that this template could be further enhanced in any future iteration of the same or similar programme. Recommendations for replicating and enhancing CEPHaS programme strengths are presented.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | WA Public Health > WA 30 Socioeconomic factors in public health (General) |
| Faculty: Department: | Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department |
| Digital Object Identifer (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.139715.1 |
| Depositing User: | Rachel Dominguez |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Oct 2023 09:36 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Nov 2023 14:15 |
| URI: | https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/23171 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |