Tools
Effective Health Care Research Consortium (2004) What are the benefits and risks of restrictive versus routine episiotomy during vaginal birth? Evidence update - Summary of a Cochrane Review. Liverpool, Effective Health Care Research Consortium, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
|
Text
MH_Episiotomy_JAN04.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. Download (337kB) |
Official URL: http://www.liv.ac.uk/evidence/evidenceupdate/MH_Ep...
Abstract
Restrictive episiotomy policies, where health staff avoid the procedure, appear to have a number of benefits compared to policies where episiotomies are performed routinely.
Item Type: | Other |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | Effective Health Care Research Consortium |
Additional Information: | Produced by the Effective Health Care Alliance Programme, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, supported by the Department of International Development UK, (http://www.liv.ac.uk/evidence). Adapted from Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Cochrane Review, Episiotomy, Parturition, Evidence Update |
Subjects: | WA Public Health > Health Problems of Special Population Groups > WA 310 Maternal welfare WQ Obstetrics > Labor > WQ 300 General works WQ Obstetrics > Obstetric Surgical Procedures > WQ 415 Delivery (including preparatory manipulation) |
Faculty: Department: | Groups (2002 - 2012) > International Health Group |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Martin Chapman |
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2011 13:14 |
Last Modified: | 06 Feb 2018 13:03 |
URI: | https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/2330 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |