Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe

Thomas, Katherine A., Sibanda, Euphemia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-1076, Johnson, Cheryl, Watadzaushe, Constancia, Ncube, Getrude, Hatzold, Karin, Tumushime, Mary K., Mutseta, Miriam, Ruhode, Nancy, Indravudh, Peach P., Cowan, Frances ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-4422 and Neuman, Melissa (2023) 'Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe'. BMC Infectious Diseases, Vol 22, Issue Suppl 1.

Preview

Text 12879_2023_Article_8695.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background:
There is a growing body of evidence for the role that communities can have in producing beneficial health outcomes. There is also an increasing recognition of the effectiveness and success of community-led interventions to promote public health efforts. This study investigated whether and how community-level measures facilitate a community-led intervention to achieve improved HIV outcomes.

Methods:
This is a secondary analysis of survey data from a cluster randomised trial in 40 rural communities in Zimbabwe. The survey was conducted four months after the intervention was initiated. Communities were randomised 1:1 to either paid distribution arm, where HIV self-test (HIVST) kits were distributed by a paid distributor, or community-led whereby members of the community were responsible for organising and conducting the distribution of HIVST kits. We used mixed effects logistic regression to assess the effect of social cohesion, problem solving, and HIV awareness on HIV testing and prevention.

Results:
We found no association between community measures and the three HIV outcomes (self-testing, new HIV diagnosis and linkage to VMMC or confirmatory testing). However, the interaction analyses highlighted that in high social cohesion communities, the odds of new HIV diagnosis was greater in the community-led arm than paid distribution arm (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.03–4.19).

Conclusion:
We found some evidence that community-led interventions reached more undiagnosed people living with HIV in places with high social cohesion. Additional research should seek to understand whether the effect of social cohesion is persistent across other community interventions and outcomes. Trial registration: PACTR201607001701788.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	WC Communicable Diseases > Virus Diseases > Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. HIV Infections > WC 503 Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. HIV infections
Faculty: Department:	Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08695-x
SWORD Depositor:	JISC Pubrouter
Depositing User:	JISC Pubrouter
Date Deposited:	02 Nov 2023 09:30
Last Modified:	02 Nov 2023 09:47
URI:	https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/23394

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item