Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: A scoping review protocol

HoekSpaans, Remy, Drumond, Bruna, van Daalen, Kim Robin, Rorato Vitor, Ana Claudia, Derbyshire, Alison, Da Silva, Adriano, Lana, Raquel Martins, Vega, Mauricio Santos, Carrasco-Escobar, Gabriel, Sobral Escada, Maria Isabel, Codeço, Claudia and Lowe, Rachel (2024) 'Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: A scoping review protocol'. PLoS ONE, Vol 19, Issue 1, e0287270.

Preview

Text pone.0287270.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (441kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: The use of drones in environment and health research is a relatively new phenomenon. A principal research activity drones are used for is environmental monitoring, which can raise concerns in local communities. Existing ethical guidance for researchers is often not specific to drone technology and practices vary between research settings. Therefore, this scoping review aims to gather the evidence available on ethical considerations surrounding drone use as perceived by local communities, ethical considerations reported on by researchers implementing drone research, and published ethical guidance related to drone deployment.
Methods and analysis: This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. The literature search will be conducted using academic databases and grey literature sources. After pilot testing the inclusion criteria and data extraction tool, two researchers will double-screen and then chart available evidence independently. A content analysis will be carried out to identify patterns of categories or terms used to describe ethical considerations related to drone usage for environmental monitoring in the literature using the R Package RQDA. Discrepancies in any phase of the project will be solved through consensus between the two reviewers. If consensus cannot be reached, a third arbitrator will be consulted.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required; only secondary data will be used. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/a78et). The results will be disseminated through publication in a scientific journal and will be used to inform drone field campaigns in the Wellcome Trust funded HARMONIZE project. HARMONIZE aims to develop cost-effective and reproducible digital infrastructure for stakeholders in climate change hotspots in Latin America & the Caribbean and will use drone technology to collect data on fine scale landscape changes.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	W General Medicine. Health Professions > W 50 Medical ethics W General Medicine. Health Professions > W 82 Biomedical technology (General) WA Public Health > WA 20.5 Research (General)
Faculty: Department:	Education Strategic Operations > Information Services
Digital Object Identifer (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287270
SWORD Depositor:	JISC Pubrouter
Depositing User:	JISC Pubrouter
Date Deposited:	01 Feb 2024 15:37
Last Modified:	01 Feb 2024 15:37
URI:	https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/23944

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item