LSTM Home > LSTM Research > LSTM Online Archive

Developing the initial programme theories on health research capacity strengthening of African universities: A realist synthesis protocol

Mutua, Meshack, Harding, Andrew and Pulford, Justin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-8480 (2024) 'Developing the initial programme theories on health research capacity strengthening of African universities: A realist synthesis protocol'. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol 23.

[img]
Preview
Text
mutua-et-al-2024-developing-the-initial-programme-theories-on-health-research-.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (740kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Health research capacity strengthening (HRCS) has been deemed as a complex, multifaceted, and dynamic activity. Despite this, most studies that assess the effectiveness of health research capacity strengthening programmes have not employed complexity-aware approaches and therefore, evidence on how and why such programmes work across different contexts is underdeveloped. This realist study seeks to elicit the initial programme theories (IPTs) that describe how and why the ‘Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science Africa’ (DELTAS Africa) programme – one of the flagship research capacity strengthening programmes in Africa – works to generate research capacity outcomes specifically in the participating African universities.
Methods and Analysis: A realist review of the DELTAS Africa programme documents, and relevant published papers that report on similar research capacity interventions will be carried out. This will help to both identify the outcome pathways and underlying assumptions of the DELTAS Africa programme, as well as tacit theories as postulated by other researchers. The review evidence will inform the drafting of the initial programme theories (IPTs). Interviews with the DELTAS Africa programme designing team will be conducted using a realist interviewing technique to unearth ontologically deeper insights on context, mechanism, and outcomes. Using the realist context-mechanism-outcome configurational maps, we will identify how contexts (i.e., within the African universities) shape mechanisms (the processes, reasoning, or behaviours triggered by the HRCS activities) through which the programme brings about an outcome at institutional level.
Conclusion: The initial programme theories will describe how and why health research capacity strengthening works, for whom and under what circumstances across the participating African universities. The programme theories will provide policy-relevant insights on the generative causal mechanisms of HRCS; evidence that is critically needed to inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of HRCS initiatives.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: W General Medicine. Health Professions > Professional practice > W88 Administrative work. Teaching. Research
WA Public Health > WA 30 Socioeconomic factors in public health (General)
WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 525 General works
Faculty: Department: Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241260138
Depositing User: Rachel Dominguez
Date Deposited: 13 Jun 2024 14:24
Last Modified: 13 Jun 2024 14:24
URI: https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/24564

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item