Nachega, Jean B, Adetokunboh, Olatunji, Uthman, Olalekan A, Knowlton, Amy W, Altice, Frederick L, Schechter, Mauro, Galárraga, Omar, Geng, Elvin, Peltzer, Karl, Chang, Larry W, Van Cutsem, Gilles, Jaffar, Shabbar ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9615-1588, Ford, Nathan, Mellins, Claude A, Remien, Robert H and Mills, Edward J (2016) 'Community-Based Interventions to Improve and Sustain Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence, Retention in HIV Care and Clinical Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries for Achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 Targets'. Current HIV/AIDS reports, Vol 13, Issue 5, pp. 241-55.
Text
Current HIV-AIDS Report_Invited Systematic Review final_02_ 05-2016_Nachega JB et al..docx - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (369kB) |
Abstract
Little is known about the effect of community versus health facility-based interventions to improve and sustain antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, virologic suppression, and retention in care among HIV-infected individuals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We systematically searched four electronic databases for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies in LMICs comparing community versus health facility-based interventions. Relative risks (RRs) for pre-defined adherence, treatment engagement (linkage and retention in care), and relevant clinical outcomes were pooled using random effect models. Eleven cohort studies and eleven RCTs (N = 97,657) were included. Meta-analysis of the included RCTs comparing community- versus health facility-based interventions found comparable outcomes in terms of ART adherence (RR = 1.02, 95 % CI 0.99 to 1.04), virologic suppression (RR = 1.00, 95 % CI 0.98 to 1.03), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.93, 95 % CI 0.73 to 1.18). The result of pooled analysis from the RCTs (RR = 1.03, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.06) and cohort studies (RR = 1.09, 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.15) found that participants assigned to community-based interventions had statistically significantly higher rates of treatment engagement. Two studies found community-based ART delivery model either cost-saving or cost-effective. Community- versus facility-based models of ART delivery resulted in at least comparable outcomes for clinically stable HIV-infected patients on treatment in LMICs and are likely to be cost-effective.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | W General Medicine. Health Professions > Health Services. Patients and Patient Advocacy > W 85 Patients. Attitude and compliance WA Public Health > Health Administration and Organization > WA 546 Local Health Administration. Community Health Services WC Communicable Diseases > Virus Diseases > Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. HIV Infections > WC 503 Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. HIV infections WC Communicable Diseases > Virus Diseases > Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. HIV Infections > WC 503.2 Therapy |
Faculty: Department: | Clinical Sciences & International Health > International Public Health Department |
Digital Object Identifer (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-016-0325-9 |
Depositing User: | Jessica Jones |
Date Deposited: | 11 Oct 2016 13:22 |
Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2019 08:20 |
URI: | https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/6259 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |