Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"

Meerpohl, Joerg J, Naude, Celeste E, Garner, Paul ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0607-6941, Mustafa, Reem A and Schünemann, Holger J (2017) 'Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research"'. Advances in Nutrition, Vol 8, Issue 5, pp. 789-790.

Text Comment re Perspective_NutriGrade.docx - Accepted Version Download (41kB)

Abstract

We read the perspective article “NutriGrade: A Scoring system to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research” published in November 2016 in Advances in Nutrition [1]. We agree it is important to assess the trustworthiness of evidence.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	QU Biochemistry > Vitamins > QU 145 Nutrition. Nutritional requirements W General Medicine. Health Professions > W 20.5 Biomedical research WA Public Health > Statistics. Surveys > WA 950 Theory or methods of medical statistics. Epidemiologic methods WZ History of Medicine. Medical Miscellany > History, By Period, Locality, etc. > WZ 112 Collective biography
Faculty: Department:	Clinical Sciences & International Health > Clinical Sciences Department
Digital Object Identifer (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.3945/an.117.016188
SWORD Depositor:	JISC Pubrouter
Depositing User:	Stacy Murtagh
Date Deposited:	11 Oct 2017 11:22
Last Modified:	06 Sep 2019 10:16
URI:	https://archive.lstmed.ac.uk/id/eprint/7641

Statistics

View details

Actions (login required)

Edit Item